The European Wedding Pattern (EMP)
The European wedding Pattern has first been described by Hajnal in 1965. A high age at marriage for both men and women, the second being ‘neolocality’ and the third a very large number of singles that never married at all although Hajnal did not give any details on how he thought this European Marriage Pattern had come into existence, he mentioned three features as being central to this pattern: the first being. Hajnal’s article was cited again and again. Their tips have already been criticized, abused (fora on the web marketing Hajnal’s EMP along with figures on urbanization and industrialization right into a debate on competition, trying to proof supremacy that is‘germanic’, also refined, by the addition of even more features.
Attributes of the EMP
A) a age that is high wedding for both gents and ladies
The very first function is a high age at wedding both for both women and men: the mean age to start with wedding for ladies has ended 23 as well as the mean chronilogical age of males is finished 26 (Hajnal 1982: 452). In their article ‘European wedding habits in perspective’, Hajnal offers but two options that come with the EMP (Hajnal 1965: 101):
- A age that is high wedding
- A proportion that is high of who never marry after all
Their article, nonetheless, explores those features completely, increasing questions that are many further research.
Peter Laslett contributes to this particular feature the age that is high of during child-birth (Laslett 1977: 13). This type of age that is high childbirth, but, is seen as an immediate result of the high age at wedding.
B) a age that is small between partners
A age that is small between spouses is obviously maybe perhaps perhaps not an attribute John Hajnal (1965) mentioned as a particular feature associated with European Marriage Pattern. Nevertheless, Hajnal hinted during the age that is large between spouses as found in non-EMP areas. Read More